Skip to main content

Reduce core wastage without using a tape core joiner.

Sometimes when cutting cores in a core cutter odd lengths are left over, they are too short to be useful so they are either discarded as waste or taped to other waste cores in an attempt to join several bits of scrap together to create a single usable core.  Taping several lengths of core together can create potentially dangerous problems that I won't go into, needless to say it's not a great idea!

But I can see why companies wish to minimise scrap core waste, so here's a potentially better way of doing so:

Save money and minimise core wastage without using tape to join together scrap bits of core
Several of our customers buy in parent cores at multiple lengths and then use the most appropriate cores for each job.  We have designed our Core Cutter to accurately measure the parent core as it is loaded, the machine then works out how much trim to cut off meaning that each subsequent cut creates a usable core.

One of our customers had an aggressively low target for reducing core wastage so they shopped around and bought cores just a little bit bigger than they needed.  Cores were bought slightly larger than needed to allow for some shrinkage while the cores were in storage waiting to be cut on their core cutter.  For example; if their target cores are 500mm in length they source 2000mm cores with a minus tolerance of zero (0) but a plus tolerance of maybe 10mm, expecting most of the cores they receive from their supplier to be around 2008mm.  The operator enters the number of cores needed on the Core Cutter touchscreen and loads in the first core, the machine then measures the core and automatically trims the spare 8mm (or whatever) off the core before making the other cuts needed in order to produce four cores that are exactly 500mm in length.  There is no scrap to be removed from the core gripper / anvil.

If the customer requires 300mm cores they buy in 2100mm parent cores with a minus tolerance of 0mm and a plus tolerance of 10mm.  Again our Core Cutter automatically works out how much trim to take off and then cuts the required number of 300mm cores with no waste (apart from a small trim that will always measure less than 10mm).

Buying in a few different lengths of parent cores sounds like it might create work for your warehouse and / or machine operators, but some core suppliers will print core sizes on the cores they supply to you, thereby simplifying the pre-job core selection process.

We do not recommend using tape to join scrap cores as the resulting cores can become unstable, damaging to materials wound on them and even dangerous to machine operators.

By using tape to join scrap cores you are introducing plastics into your processes, which in turn can contaminate your recycling.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trim removal on slitters

A trim fan attached to a slitter. As discussed previously on this blog the process of slitting (at its most basic) can be reduced to the one-line description of ' a big roll is loaded on one side of the slitter rewinder, and smaller rolls are loaded off the other side'  and that's fine... most of the time. Here comes the example! If a 1000mm wide roll is loaded onto a rewinder and is slit down into rolls that are 212mm wide then four rolls would be produced.  If your mental maths is up to scratch you might have noticed that 4x212 does not equal 1000, and that means that from the original / master / jumbo roll there will be roughly 117mm left over.    Sometimes this happens because the edges of jumbo rolls are discarded due to damage, print reasons or simply because the material being slit isn't coated all the way to the edges of the roll. So what happens to this waste material? Waste material can be wound onto cores in the same way 'correct' rolls are,

Slitter fixes, I love days like this!

Slitter downtime is something everyone wants to avoid - when a machine isn't running it isn't being productive, and therefore it isn't making money.  Ensuring that slitter rewinders (and of course, all other converting machinery) run at peak efficiency is a two-way street, and one of the many things that makes me proud to work at Universal Converting Equipment is our ability to respond to customers' service needs fast, really fast. Late yesterday afternoon we took a call from the production manager at a UK facility who was tearing his hair out due to the failure of a third party machine.  We immediately dispatched an engineer, and even although the failed machine wasn't one that we had built our expert was able to get the machine back up and running in well under an hour. This speed of response is by no means unusual for us, but the reason I wanted to mention it here on my blog is that I was fortunate enough to be the person who took the call from the very el

Slitter words mean what now?

Slitting / cutting machines are complex beasts, and so I guess it is perfectly natural that a complex vocabulary is spawned by discussing the methods and mechanics of slitting.  The corporate culture within companies that use converting machinery usually ensures that slitter operators and their management all speak the same language, but when a need arises for slitter users to speak to outside agencies (when buying or servicing machinery) then it can become a bit of a challenge making oneself understood. Introducing the Slitter Glossary. When new customers contact me about buying a new slitter (or upgrading / servicing an third-party machine) it is important to make sure I fully understand our customers' needs.  I concentrate a large portion of my energies  making the specification part of the buying process incredibly simple for our customers, and recently a part of that process has involved creating a glossary of slitter terms . The slitter glossary is a bit like a garden or